Full Accreditation granted with improvement opportunities in the following standards and criteria: Notes on Criteria 5.3.2.b and 5.8.1.Basis for final decision: Performance expectations established by the programs are being met. The business programs meet the overall requirements of the six ACBSP standards. Note on Criterion 5.3.2.b: Accredited programs should focus on accepted levels for academically qualified or professionally qualified faculty as a basis for demonstrating quality. Although, the institution has developed an improvement plan and made efforts to overcome the situation in an environment that does not currently have sufficient doctorates, the program’s percentage of credit hours taught by academically qualified faculty does not reach the level of 40%. The next report should focus on evidence of improvement. Note on Criterion 5.8.1: Faculty members must be actively involved in professional activities that will enhance the depth and scope of their knowledge and that of their disciplines, as well as the effectiveness of their teaching. The institution must demonstrate a reasonable balance of scholarly and professional activities by the faculty as a whole consistent with the stated institutional mission. Although, the institution has made great efforts to develop and encourage research and professional activity, all faculty should be actively involved. Future reports should identify progress.